A couple of things caught my eye today. One, from Faith in Action, was an article on the ERA.
Not the real estate outfit, no. No, not an Earned Run Average, either. Definitely not.
No, this ERA is the Equal Rights Amendment, which first hit the streets in tinsel-and-new-things year of 1972 and, since the Constitution places no time limits on the passage of amendments, it’s actually still alive. Some amendments have time limits in their texts, but the Constitution itself calls out no such thing.
What disturbs me the most about this seemingly lame little amendment is Section 2, which plainly says, “The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.” Since Congress routinely disavows itself from anything remotely similar to the Constitution the thought of it enforcing something as vague as the ERA is frightening. The 110th in particular. If anyone has been paying attention for the past couple of months he or she will be fully aware of what this Congress calls “appropriate.”
We’ve seen the 110th attempt to censor blogs, (conservative) organizations, and religious organizations. For the time being that is stopped. But swift on its skirts we now have HR 254, “David’s Law,” a supposed hate speech rule that will stop blogging dead in its tracks if it’s passed in Senate conference and signed by our predictably (more…)
Ellicia Stanley & her husband SPC Reid Stanley