Thought you’d never ask.
I quote heavily, cited or not, from various contributors to WorldNetDaily (WND) throughout this post. There is information herein that is critical to anyone interested in arresting the decay that has its death grip on the throat of academia. It is in that spirit that I gently but forcefully say the following:
If you’re too busy, click it later and satisfy yourself with the following summation.
-
“News that a university librarian is suing professors who accused him of “sexual harassment” after he recommended the best-selling book “The Marketing of Evil” comes just as the Midwest school’s accreditation is being reviewed – with Tuesday the last day for the public to comment on the school’s track record.”
Thus starts a WorldNetDaily article on the homosexual atrocity attack on the name, reputation, and professional standing of Scott Savage, a librarian at Ohio State University at Mansfield. David Limbaugh, in writing the column, said that Mr. Savage “got a quick lesson in ‘tolerance’ while serving on a committee responsible for selecting books for incoming OSU students to read as part of their ‘First Year Reading Experience.’”
My bet is that no one—not one solitary person other than those attuned to reliable online journalism—has heard the real story on this, and certainly not from the lamestream media. Conventional media is too heavily invested in homosexuals-as-the-downtrodden to deal with the truth of this case. Even the weather on lamestream is questionable.
Well, the timing for the rest of us is excellent, if not a little close.
Here’s the Deal:
On this past Tuesday, March 6th, as reported by WND, Savage’s attorney filed a defamation lawsuit in the Court of Common Pleas in Richland County, Ohio. The suit names faculty members who accused him of sexual harassment.
On this coming Tuesday, March 13th, a public comment period will end, so your personal opportunity to take advantage of this is nearing an end—I just found out about it today.
What’s happening is this: The comment period for OSU’s ten-year review by the Commission on Higher Education expires on the 13th. That is the deadline for public comment. The Commission takes public input into account during its deliberations, so this opportunity should not be taken lightly. This is a chance to participate in something that is of great current significance, and it is not going to be available again for the next ten years.
If we don’t do something to correct our path now, ten years from now won’t be worth waiting for!
David Kupalian, author of The Marketing of Evil , one of four best-selling books recommended by Mr. Savage, writes this:
-
“Scott Savage recommended four best-selling conservative books, and as a result the faculty voted to persecute him, to endanger his career, his livelihood, his family, and his reputation with the stigma of ’sexual harassament’”
Kupalian, one of several WND heavy-hitters, also wrote an article titled “How Ohio State University is marketing evil,” and you’ll want to read it. If you’re a university—even a high school—student, you are likely very much attuned to this whole sorry story with different names, different details, same intellectual dishonesty and venomous depravity. The story is “sorry” because, if you are in those groups, you have likely been indoctrinated past the point of realizing you are the victims you are.
I hope I’m wrong.
Action List:
1.) Read these links quickly.
2.) Pass it on for general knowledge to everyone you trust without feeling like Tuesday restrains the validity of these events—just pass it on. The war against homosexual bigotry will continue until we defeat our intellectually and ethically debased opposition.
3.) Use the link to the Third-Party Comment Form for the Commission of Higher Education
Kupalian concludes his linked article (above) with this telling statement:
-
“Probably the best chance to bring about meaningful change at OSU,” he added, “is if the Commission of Higher Education gives them a warning, but that will only happen if they’re informed about this outrageous case of campus intolerance.”
ara
Hi ara
The bigotry displayed by the gay community towards anyone that questions this particular lifestyle is very disturbing. The link you referenced is just another in a long line of examples of how lives are destroyed by simply initiating dialog or disagreeing.
The rub begins with the movie and television industry’s attempt to force the acceptance of this particular lifestyle on the general public. If anyone speaks up then they are called homophobic, intolerant or some other PC diatribe.
Their favorite seems to be the casual destruction of someone’s life. This tactic may seem familiar as it is often used by leftist as a method of control. I hear, accept this or I will destroy you is a popular theme among evil dictators.
Lord Crimson
LC–
You are always welcome on my site. I have much appreciated the dialogue and the welcome I consistently find on yours (http:lordcrimson@wordpress.com)
Your comment here is spot on. I don’t know if you were able to read my “About A Rational Aversion” page, but there and elsewhere I explain how the term “homophobia,” having clearly been coined by people who don’t speak English, actually works very much in the favor of normal and ethical people.
That is because homophobia is an irrational fear of or aversion to homosexuals. My aversion to whiney, lying rump rangers is anything but irrational. Hollywood types and other moral cowards who can’t bend over frontwards fast enough to cater to the whims of homosexuals are the ones who, in their irrational and abject terror of being called a name, surrender and grovel.
That is irrational.
ara