The Supreme Court of the United States (some call it SCOTUS, I call it SCROTUS) will hear District of Columbia v Heller. The following Press Release from the Second Amendment Foundation encapsulates precedent and argument:
- NEWS RELEASE
SAF EXCITED ABOUT SUPREME COURT REVIEW OF HELLER CASE
BELLEVUE, WA – For the first time in United States history, the Supreme Court will hear a case that should, once and for all, decide the meaning of the Second Amendment to the Bill of Rights, and the Second Amendment Foundation could not be happier.
“We are confident that the high court will rule that the Second Amendment affirms and protects an individual civil right to keep and bear arms,” said SAF founder Alan M. Gottlieb. “Previous Supreme Court rulings dating back more than a century have consistently referred to the Second Amendment as protective of an individual right, but the case of District of Columbia v. Heller focuses on that issue, and we expect the court to settle the issue once and for all.”
The court announced today that it will hear an appeal of the case, in which seven Washington, D.C. residents have sued to overturn the district’s 31-year-old gun ban. In March, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals ruled 2-1 that the ban is unconstitutional because it violates the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. The court further ruled that the amendment does protect an individual right. The ruling set off a firestorm, in which gun control proponents, who had frequently claimed to support a right to keep and bear arms, dropped all pretenses and publicly acknowledged that they do not believe there is such a right protected by the Second Amendment.
“An affirmative ruling by the Supreme Court will probably not be the death knell for the extremist citizen disarmament movement,” Gottlieb said, “but it will properly cripple their campaign to destroy an important civil right, the one that protects all of our other rights. The insidious effort to strip American citizens of their firearms rights, while at the same time permanently harming public safety must end.
“The Washington, D.C. gun ban has been a monumental failure and the crime statistics prove that,” Gottlieb said. “For almost 70 years, gun banners have deliberately misinterpreted and misrepresented the high court’s language in the U.S. v Miller ruling in 1939. It is long past the time that this important issue be put to rest, and the Heller case will provide the court with that opportunity.”
-END-
Chances of a victory for reason and for the Constitution itself are good.
The US Constitution is very, very clear that all rights and freedoms in the Bill of Rights are pre-existing. They pre-exist the foundation of this very nation. The Constitution says that. Read it. Send questions if you like.
What we need to see next is the indictment on felony charges of all politicians, bureaucrats, and law enforcement who ignore or try to derail the expected ruling. What charges?
Well, for starters, complicity (aiding and abetting) in all crimes of murder, rape, assault, armed robbery, and general mayhem. Every one. Nationwide. If any crime “could” have been stopped by a legally (Constitutionally) armed law abiding American and any one, single citizen had his or her right to keep and bear (carry) infringed by any politician, bureaucrat, or law enforcement personnel in any way, then that official or bureaucrat will be charged with overt participation in and support of every single crime that occurs anywhere in the nation.
If one politician, bureaucrat, or whomever tries to get away with frustrating the rights of even one citizen anywhere then that politician, bureaucrat, or whomever is guilty of complicity in all crimes everywhere.
Angry? Well, yeah.
ara
